Ten interviews and four personas to help a community organisation see its audience more honestly.

Where we started. A community organisation wanting to grow its reach across an audience spanning 18 to 70+, with wildly varying interest in Cyprus-related issues.
What we did. A four-hour discovery workshop with the Federation's team. Ten in-depth interviews with Cypriots across UK cities. Four personas, grounded in real interview material rather than smoothed-over assumptions.
What changed. A clearer, more honest picture of who the audience is, what's not landing, and where the organisation's current tone gets in its own way. Delivered pro bono.
The engagement opened with a four-hour workshop. The partner facilitated; I came out of it with the brief for what to dig into. Ten interviews followed, sourced jointly with the Federation's team. The audience spans students in their twenties through to retirees, distributed across London, Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool. Different generations, different politics, different relationships with Cypriot identity. One structured script, ten very different conversations.

Four personas came out of the synthesis. Each was anchored in real interview material, not blended into a flattering average. They surfaced patterns the Federation had felt but hadn't named: events that read as London-centric, communications that felt more political than communal, a logo and tone that landed dated to younger Cypriots, a real desire to belong that wasn't being met by the current shape of the organisation.
The honest finding wasn't that the work was bad. It was that the audience had moved on faster than the organisation had.




I don't have visibility into what the Federation did with the personas after handover. The work was pro bono. The partner cared about the cause; I was Cypriot, and willing. Sometimes that's the engagement.
The output people remember from research isn't always the deliverable. Sometimes it's the conversation it makes possible.